Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Oncologists’ Perspectives of Their Roles and Responsibilities During Multi-disciplinary Breast Cancer Follow-Up

  • Heather B. Neuman(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Nicole M. Steffens
    ,
  • Nora Jacobson
    ,
  • Amye Tevaarwerk
    ,
  • Bethany Anderson
    ,
  • Lee G. Wilke
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of follow-up provided to the 3 million U.S. breast cancer survivors is a high priority. Current guidelines do not provide guidance regarding who should participate in follow-up or what providers’ specific responsibilities should be. Given the multidisciplinary nature of breast cancer care, this results in significant variation and creates the potential for redundancy and/or gaps. Our objective was to provide insight into why different types of oncologists believe their participation in follow-up is necessary. Methods: A purposeful sample of breast medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists was identified (n = 35) and in-depth one-on-one interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Medical oncologists were driven by a sense of Responsibility for Ongoing Therapy, perceived Strong Patient Relationship, and belief that their systemic approach to follow-up represented a Specific Skillset beneficial to patients. In contrast, surgical and radiation oncologists were selective about which patients they followed, participating when they perceived their Specific Skillset of enhanced local–regional assessments would be valuable. Additionally, they endorsed participating to Ensure Follow-up is Received or not participating to Minimize Redundancy. These individual decisions led to either a Complementary Oncologist Team or Primary Oncologist follow-up approach. Conclusions: Oncologists’ feel responsible for the cancer-related components of follow-up. Differences amongst oncology specialists’ perceived responsibilities influenced decisions to provide ongoing follow-up. Based on these individual decisions, a Complementary Oncologist Team or Primary Oncologist model of care evolves organically. Guidelines that explicitly direct patients into a care model have the potential to significantly improve care quality and efficiency.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 708-714 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of surgical oncology (Volume 23, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 03/01/2016

ISSN

1068-9265

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84957844454
  • PubMed: 26474556

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
17
Captures
46

Funding Details

This project was funded through the University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center Academic Oncologist Training Program (NIH 5K12CA087718) and the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health Scholar Program (NIH K12 HD055894). It also was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, through the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000427).
FundersFunding numbers
Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health Scholar Program
K12 HD055894
University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
NIH
-
NCI
K12CA087718
NCATS
UL1TR000427