Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Optimization of utilization of serum protein analysis: Role of the electronic medical record in promoting consultation by pathology

  • Hamid M. Zia(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Gurmukh Singh
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Screening for monoclonal gammopathies is usually done by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and serum free light chain tests. SPEP may be followed by immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). IFE may be ordered by the treating physician or be at the discretion of the pathologist. We examined the appropriateness of IFE ordering by treating physicians and report on our findings, follow-up changes to the ordering process, and results of the change. We retrospectively analyzed the data from our laboratory from April 2009 through July 2012. In April 2009, 3 options for test ordering were available for the clinicians: SPEP with reflex IFE, SPEP only, and SPEP with IFE. This test ordering option was limited to SPEP with reflex IFE only in April 2010. We compared the rates of SPEP and IFE performed in the 2 periods (ie, April 2009 through April 2010 and May 2010 through July 2012). There was a substantial drop in the IFE/SPEP ratio from 0.47 to 0.21. Review of electronic medical records by the consultant pathologist was instrumental in improving the utilization and enhancing the value of pathology consultation. Possible impacts on laboratory costs, revenue, and overall health care are also presented.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 793-797 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Volume 139, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2013

Publication status

Published - 06/2013

ISSN

0002-9173

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84878381340
  • PubMed: 23690123

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.58
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
citations
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
62
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
25
Citation count
11