Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes depend on diagnostic criteria and therapy

  • Guillermo Montalban-Bravo
    ,
  • Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
    ,
  • Caleb A. Class
    ,
  • Koji Sasaki
    ,
  • Farhad Ravandi
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is a heterogeneous disorder defined by multilineage dysplasia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)-related karyotype, or history of prior MDS. We evaluated 415 patients with AML-MRC treated from 2013 to 2018 and analyzed their clinical outcomes based on the diagnostic criteria of AML-MRC, therapy type and mutation profile. Criteria for AML-MRC included: cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MRC-C) in 243 (59%), prior history of MDS in 75 (18%) including 47 (11%) with previously untreated MDS (AML-MRC-H) and 28 (7%) with previously treated MDS (AML-MRC-TS), and 97 (23%) with multilineage dysplasia (AML-MRC-M). Median age was 70 years (range 18-94). Among 95 evaluable patients, a total of 37 (39%) had secondary-type (ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, ZRSR2) mutations. Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1 tended to appear in dominant clones. By multivariate analysis, AML-MRC subtype, age and serum LDH levels were independent predictors of outcome, with patients with AML-MRC-M (HR 0.56, CI 0.38-0.84, P =.004) and AML-MRC-H having better OS. Compared to a cohort of 468 patients with AML without MRC, patients with AML-MRC-M/AML-MRC-H had similar outcomes to those with intermediate risk AML by European LeukemiaNet criteria. Intensive therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with AML-MRC-M (HR 0.42, CI 0.19-0.94, P =.036) and with improved EFS in AML-MRC-M and AML-MRC-H (HR 0.26, CI 0.10-0.63, P =.003). This data suggests that not all diagnostic criteria for AML-MRC define high-risk patients and that specific subgroups may benefit from different therapeutic interventions.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 612-622 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Hematology (Volume 95, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 01/01/2020
  • Published - 06/01/2020

Publication status

Published - 06/01/2020

ISSN

0361-8609

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85082091309
  • PubMed: 32112433
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8636-1071/work/74912368

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
8
SciVal
FWCI
1.66
SciVal
Author count
24
SciVal
Paper percentile
95
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.04
Fractional count
23
Fractional count
0.96
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
64
Captures
67
Mentions
1
Usage
21

Funding Details

This work was supported in part by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672 (all authors) and the University of Texas MD Anderson MDS/AML Moon Shot (G.M.-B., R.K.-S., C.B.B., C.C., K.T., K.A.S., C.B-R., H.K., and G.G.-M.).
FundersFunding numbers
University of Texas, Galveston, Texas, University of Wisconsin Medical School
-
NCI
P30CA016672
MD Anderson Cancer Center
CA016672