Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Outcomes of vaginal vault prolapse repair with a high uterosacral suspension procedure utilizing bilateral single sutures

  • Thomas L. Wheeler(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Kimberly A. Gerten
    ,
  • Holly E. Richter
    ,
  • Angela G. Duke
    ,
  • R. Edward Varner
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe an approach for performing a high uterosacral vaginal vault suspension and to report anatomical and subjective results. Anatomic measures and validated symptom-specific questionnaires were performed pre- and postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was also ascertained. Thirty-five women, who underwent a two-suture high uterosacral suspension, participated. Mean follow-up interval was 23.1±10.1 months. Postoperative point C was -7.8±1.60 (median, -8.0, range, -4.0 to -10.0), and the mean preoperative to postoperative change in point C was 5.9±5.56 cm (median 4.75, range -3.0 to 20.0, p-value<0.0001). Patient satisfaction was high with 88.9% indicating that they would have the surgery again. There were no ureteral injuries or kinks noted on intraoperative cystoscopy. No patient required reoperation for recurrent prolapse or urinary incontinence. Overall, the two-suture high uterosacral vaginal vault suspension is an acceptable technique for repairing apical prolapse.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1207-1213 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Urogynecology Journal (Volume 18, Issue 10)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2007

Publication status

Published - 10/2007

ISSN

0937-3462

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 35648951143
  • PubMed: 17265169

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.08
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
17
SciVal
Paper percentile
70

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
19
Captures
15