Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Outpatient thyroidectomy is safe in the elderly and super-elderly

  • Jamie Segel Grubey
    ,
  • Yazdan Raji
    ,
  • William S. Duke
    ,
  • David J. Terris(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objectives: 1) Determine the safety of outpatient thyroidectomy in the geriatric patient population. 2) Analyze the risk of postoperative complications from thyroid surgery in patients aged over 65 years (elderly) and aged over 80 years (super-elderly) undergoing ambulatory thyroidectomy compared to patients aged 21 through 40 years. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing thyroidectomy between January 2008 and July 2015 at a tertiary academic institution. Method: Patients were stratified by age, and three subsets within this population were considered and analyzed further: youthful/control (aged 21–40 years), elderly (aged 65–79 years), and super-elderly (≥ 80 years). Patient demographics, surgical and pathological data, admission status, complication, and readmission rates were recorded. Results: A total of 1,429 thyroidectomies were accomplished; of these, 1,207 (84.5%) were outpatient operations. Among the outpatients, 85.2% were female, 14.1% were male, and the mean age was 50.3 ± 15.2 years. The control (youthful) group was comprised of 328 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years; the elderly group of 201 patients had a mean age of 70.3 years; and 16 patients in the super-elderly group had a mean age 82.7 years. The complication rates (5.2%, 5.0%, and 6.3%, respectively; P = 0.98) and re-admission rates (1.5%, 1.5%, and 0.0%, respectively; P = 0.89) were not different among these groups. Conclusion: Outpatient thyroid surgery is as safe in appropriately selected elderly and super-elderly patients as it is in a control group of youthful patients. Therefore, age should not be a contraindication to conducting thyroidectomy on an ambulatory basis. Level of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:290–294, 2018.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 290-294 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Laryngoscope (Volume 128, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2017
  • Published - 01/2018

Publication status

Published - 01/2018

ISSN

0023-852X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85020096755
  • PubMed: 28573781

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
17
SciVal
FWCI
3.95
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
90
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
27
Captures
27