Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Periodontal repair in dogs: A biosabsorbable calcium carbonate coral implant enhances space provision of alveolar bone regeneration in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration

  • Ulf M E Wikesjö(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Won Hee Lim
    ,
  • Saghi S. Razi
    ,
  • Thorarinn J. Sigurdsson
    ,
  • Michael B. Lee
    ,
  • Dimitris N. Tatakis
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Temple University
    ,
  • University of Akureyri
    ,
  • Loma Linda University Health
    ,
  • Ohio State University
    ,
  • W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Background: Collapse or compression of a barrier device into a periodontal defect or onto the root surface compromises outcomes following guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Bone biomaterials have been suggested to support regeneration of alveolar bone and to improve space provision with GTR devices. The objective of this study was to evaluate space provision, alveolar bone, and cementum regeneration following use of a bioabsorbable, calcium carbonate biomaterial in conjunction with GTR. Methods: Routine, critical size, 5 to 6 mm, supraalveolar, periodontal defects were created in 5 young adult beagle dogs. Alternate jaw quadrants in consecutive animals received GTR and the coral biomaterial (cGTR) or GTR alone. The animals were euthanized 4 weeks postsurgery and tissue blocks processed for histometric analysis. Results: The coral implant particles were surrounded by newly-formed bone or immersed in connective tissue and appeared to resorb and be replaced by bone. There was limited, if any, appreciable cementum regeneration. Space provision was enhanced in cGTR compared to GTR sites (6.1 ± 1.6 versus 2.4 ± 0.8 mm2; P<0.05). Bone regeneration (height) was significantly increased in cGTR compared to GTR sites averaging 1.9 ± 0.6 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P<0.05). Bone regeneration (area) was 2-fold greater in cGTR sites compared to the GTR control (3.3 ± 1.8 versus 1.4 ± 0.5 mm2), however the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions: The coral implant significantly enhanced space provision for GTR while alveolar bone formation appeared to be enhanced by its use. Increased healing intervals are needed to fully understand the biologic value of the coral implant as an adjunct to GTR.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 957-964 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of periodontology (Volume 74, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/01/2003

Publication status

Published - 07/01/2003

ISSN

0022-3492

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0041922550
  • PubMed: 12931757

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.36
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
38
SciVal
Paper percentile
81
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
51
Citation count
43