Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: A comparison of primary care providers and oncologists

  • Winson Y. Cheung
    ,
  • Noreen Aziz
    ,
  • Anne Michelle Noone
    ,
  • Julia H. Rowland
    ,
  • Arnold L. Potosky
    ,
  • John Z. Ayanian
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
    ,
  • National Institutes of Health
    ,
  • Georgetown University
    ,
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
    ,
  • Emory University
    ,
  • American Cancer Society
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Purpose: New strategies for delivering cancer follow-up care are needed. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) and oncologists to assess how physician attitudes toward and self-efficacy with cancer follow-up affect preferences for different cancer survivorship models. Methods: The survey of physician attitudes regarding the care of cancer survivors was mailed to a randomly selected national sample of PCPs and oncologists to evaluate their perspectives regarding physician roles, knowledge about survivorship care processes, and views on cancer surveillance. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to examine how physician attitudes towards, and self-efficacy with, their own skills affected preferences for different cancer survivorship care models. Results: Of 3,434 physicians identified, a total of 2,026 participants provided eligible responses: 938 PCPs and 1,088 oncologists. Most PCPs (51 %) supported a PCP/shared care model; whereas, the majority of specialists (59 %) strongly endorsed an oncologist-based model (p < 0.001). Less than a quarter of PCPs and oncologists preferred specialized survivor clinics. A significant proportion of oncologists (87 %) did not feel that PCPs should take on the primary role of cancer follow-up. Most PCPs believed that they were better able to perform breast and colorectal cancer follow-up (57 %), detect recurrent cancers (74 %), and offer psychosocial support (50 %), but only a minority (32 %) was willing to assume primary responsibility. PCPs already involved with cancer surveillance (43 %) were more likely to prefer a PCP/shared care than oncologist-based survivorship model (OR, 2.08; 95 % CI, 1.34-3.23). Conclusions and Implications for Cancer Survivors: PCPs and oncologists have different preferences for models of cancer survivorship care. Prior involvement with cancer surveillance was one of the strongest predictors of PCPs' willingness to assume this responsibility.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 343-354 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Cancer Survivorship (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2013

Publication status

Published - 09/2013

ISSN

1932-2259

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84881222783
  • PubMed: 23526165

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.92
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
citations
73
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
105
Captures
105
Social media
1

Funding Details

Funding National Cancer Institute HHSN261201000316C and intramural support from the American Cancer Society
FundersFunding numbers
ACS
-
NCI
HHSN261201000316C, P30CA051008