Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Pneumonitis as a complication of immune system targeting drugs?—a meta-analysis of anti-PD/PD-L1 immunotherapy randomized clinical trials

  • Mohamed Rahouma(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Massimo Baudo
    ,
  • Maha Yahia
    ,
  • Mohamed Kamel
    ,
  • Katherine D. Gray
    ,
  • Adham Elmously
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Cairo University
    ,
  • Cornell University
    ,
  • University of Cincinnati
    ,
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    ,
  • Etablissement Public Hospitalier de Hassi Bahbah
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Anti-PD/PD-L1-targeted immunotherapy is associated with remarkably high rates of durable clinical responses in patients across a range of tumor types, although their high incidence of skin, gastrointestinal, and endocrine side effects with their use. The risk of pneumonitis associated with checkpoint inhibition therapy is not well described. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing anti-PD/PD-L1 mono-immunotherapy (IMM) to chemotherapy (CTH) protocols in cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the pneumonitis rate in IMM compared to CTH. Secondary endpoints were (I) high-grade pneumonitis rate in IMM compared to CTH and (II) tumor response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between IMM and CTH. Random model and leave-one-out-analysis were performed. Results: Thirteen RCTs studying 7,246 patients were included; 3,704 (51.12%) patients in the IMM arm and 3,542 (48.88%) patients in the chemotherapy arm. Seven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) RCTs were included with 4,164 patients; 2,101 in the IMM arm and 2,063 patients in the CTH arm. Three RCTs were on melanoma patients (n=1,390). Nine RCTs compared mono-immunotherapy to CTH [docetaxel in 5 studies (38.5%), platinum-based in 2 studies (15.4%), dacarbazine in 1 study (7.7%) and everolimus in 1 study]. Both high-grade and all-grade pneumonitis were higher among patients in the IMM arm when compared to the CTH arm (OR =4.39, 95% CI: 1.65–11.69, P=0.003 and OR =2.46, 95% CI: 1.29–4.6, P=0.007). Tumor response rate was significantly better in the immunotherapy arm (OR =2.31, 95% CI: 1.62–3.29, P<0.001). PFS and OS were longer in patients who received IMM compared to patients in the CTH arm (HR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.65–0.85, P<0.001, and HR =0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77, P<0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of high-grade and all-grade pneumonitis is higher in anti-PD-1 therapy but not in anti-PD-L1 therapy when compared to traditional CTH regimens for NSCLC and melanoma. High-grade adverse events were otherwise more common in the CTH arm. Tumor response rate, PFS, and OS are all substantially improved with IMM over CTH. These results can be used to guide therapy selection and set expectations for treatment effect in these patients.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 521-534 (14 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Thoracic Disease (Volume 11, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2019

Publication status

Published - 2019

ISSN

2072-1439

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85065982730

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.40
SciVal
Author count
14
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
91
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.07
Fractional count
13
Fractional count
0.93
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
41
Citation count
15