Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Pre-arrest predictors of failure to survive after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis

  • Mark H. Ebell(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Anna M. Afonso
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to perform a systematic review of pre-arrest predictors of the outcome of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adults. Methods: We searched PubMed for studies published since 1985 and bibliographies of previous meta-analyses. We included studies with predominantly adult patients, limited to in-hospital arrest, using an explicit definition of cardiopulmonary arrest and CPR and reporting survival to discharge by at least one pre-arrest variable. A total of 35 studieswere included in the final analysis. Inclusion criteria, design elements and results were abstracted in parallel by both investigators. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results: The rate of survival to discharge was 17.5%; we found a trend towards increasing survival in more recent studies. Metastatic malignancy [odds ratio (OR) 3.9] or haematologic malignancy (OR 3.9), age over 70, 75 or 80 years (OR 1.5, 2.8 and 2.7, respectively), black race (OR 2.1), altered mental status (OR 2.2), dependency for activities of daily living (range OR 3.2-7.0 depending on specific activity), impaired renal function (OR 1.9), hypotension on admission (OR 1.8) and admission for pneumonia (OR 1.7), trauma (OR 1.7) or medical non-cardiac diagnosis (OR 2.2) were significantly associated with failure to survive to discharge; cardiovascular diagnoses and co-morbidities were associated with improved survival (range OR 0.23-0.53). Elevated CPR risk scores predicted failure to survive but have not been validated consistently in different populations. Conclusions: We identified several pre-arrest variables associated with failure to survive to discharge. This information should be shared with patients as part of a shared decision-making process regarding the use of do not resuscitate orders.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 505-515 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Family Practice (Volume 28, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2011

Publication status

Published - 10/2011

ISSN

0263-2136

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80052950569
  • PubMed: 21596693

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
5.89
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
citations
78
SciVal
Paper percentile
95
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
144
Citation count
115