Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Prediction for sustained deep molecular response of BCR-ABL1 levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase

  • Koji Sasaki
    ,
  • Hagop Kantarjian
    ,
  • Susan O'Brien
    ,
  • Farhad Ravandi
    ,
  • Marina Konopleva
    ,
  • Gautam Borthakur
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    ,
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University
    ,
  • University of California at Irvine
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The achievement of a sustained deep molecular response is a goal of increasing relevance because it opens the possibility of treatment discontinuation. The objective of this analysis was to develop a prediction model for a sustained molecular response with BCR-ABL1 level <0.0032% on the international scale (MR 4.5 ) for at least 2 years according to BCR-ABL1 levels achieved within the first 12 months of therapy. METHODS: Data for 603 patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in consecutive prospective clinical trials were analyzed. The best fit average molecular response was defined by robust linear regression models, with which the average molecular levels were defined. The minimum acceptable molecular response was defined by quantile regression for the 95th percentile, with which the worst 5% BCR-ABL1 levels were identified. RESULTS: In 603 patients with a median follow-up of 103 months, 2002 BCR-ABL1–level data points within 1 year of tyrosine kinase inhibitors were identified. The regression equation for the best fit average levels for a sustained MR 4.5 was Log 10 (PCR) = −0.1424 × (Months) – 0.8668, and the regression equation for minimum acceptable levels was Log 10 (PCR) = −0.1403 × (Months) + 0.6142 (where PCR indicates polymerase chain reaction). To achieve a sustained MR 4.5 , the best fit average levels were 0.051%, 0.019%, 0.007%, and 0.003% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; the minimum acceptable levels were 1.561%, 0.592%, 0.225%, and 0.085% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This model proposes optimal values that predict the highest probability of reaching such a goal. These values can be used to guide therapy when a sustained MR 4.5 is the objective. Cancer 2018;124:1160-8.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1160-1168 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Cancer (Volume 124, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/15/2018

Publication status

Published - 03/15/2018

ISSN

0008-543X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85038424801
  • PubMed: 29266206
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8636-1071/work/68888160

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.06
Fractional count
15
Fractional count
0.94
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
8
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.69
SciVal
Author count
16
SciVal
Paper percentile
76

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
9
Captures
29
Citation count
27

Funding Details

This study was partly supported by MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672 and the National Cancer Institute (award P01 CA049639). We thank Dr. O. Miura (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for useful advice.