Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Primary and secondary structural analyses of glutathione S-transferase π from human placenta

  • Hassan Ahmad
    ,
  • Douglas E. Wilson
    ,
  • Richard R. Fritz
    ,
  • Shivendra V. Singh
    ,
  • Rheem D. Medh
    ,
  • Gregg T. Nagle
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The primary structure of glutathione S-transferase (GST) π from a single human placenta was determined. The structure was established by chemical characterization of tryptic and cyanogen bromide peptides as well as automated sequence analysis of the intact enzyme. The structural analysis indicated that the protein is comprised of 209 amino acid residues and gave no evidence of post-translational modifications. The amino acid sequence differed from that of the deduced amino acid sequence determined by nucleotide sequence analysis of a cDNA clone (Kano, T., Sakai, M., and Muramatsu, M., 1987, Cancer Res.47, 5626-5630) at position 104 which contained both valine and isoleucine whereas the deduced sequence from nucleotide sequence analysis identified only isoleucine at this position. These results demonstrated that in the one individual placenta studied at least two GST π genes are coexpressed, probably as a result of allelomorphism. Computer assisted consensus sequence evaluation identified a hydrophobic region in GST π (residues 155-181) that was predicted to be either a buried transmembrane helical region or a signal sequence region. The significance of this hydrophobic region was interpreted in relation to the mode of action of the enzyme especially in regard to the potential involvement of a histidine in the active site mechanism. A comparison of the chemical similarity of five known human GST complete enzyme structures, one of π, one of μ, two of α, and one microsomal, gave evidence that all five enzymes have evolved by a divergent evolutionary process after gene duplication, with the microsomal enzyme representing the most divergent form.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 398-408 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (Volume 278, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/1990

Publication status

Published - 05/01/1990

ISSN

0003-9861

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0025255437
  • PubMed: 2327795

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
13
Citation count
108

Funding Details

i This investigation was supported in part by USPHS Grants CA 27967, GM 32304, EY 04396, and CA 17701. NIH support for BIONET was to IntelliGenetics, Inc. Grant 5 U41 RR 01685. ‘Present address: Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136.
FundersFunding numbers
NEI
R01EY004396
USPHS
EY 04396, CA 27967, GM 32304, CA 17701