Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Psychological profile of male and female animal abusers

  • Rebecca L. Schwartz
    ,
  • William Fremouw
    ,
  • Allison Schenk
    ,
  • Laurie L. Ragatz
  • West Virginia University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Abstract

This study had three purposes: to explore psychological characteristics of animal abusers (criminal thinking styles, empathy, and personality traits), to replicate previously reported results (past illegal actions, bullying behavior), and to examine potential gender differences. The self-reported animal abuser group was 29 college students who reported two or more incidents of animal abuse; controls were 29 college students matched on age and gender. Participants completed self-report measures of criminal thinking, illegal behaviors, bullying, empathy, and the five-factor personality traits. Results indicated animal abusers had more previous criminal behaviors, were more likely to bully, and had the highest scores on the power orientation criminal thinking scale. Abuser by gender interactions were detected; female animal abusers scored significantly higher on several measures of criminal thinking, were found to be more likely to bully, and exhibited lower scores on measures of perspective taking and empathy compared to female controls.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 846-861 (16 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Interpersonal Violence (Volume 27, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2012

Publication status

Published - 03/2012

ISSN

0886-2605

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84858857962
  • PubMed: 22007108

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.48
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
29
SciVal
Paper percentile
85
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
37
Captures
76