Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Psychological profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dyssynergia and those with slow transit constipation

  • Satish Sanku Chander Rao(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Kara Seaton
    ,
  • Megan J. Miller
    ,
  • Konrad Schulze
    ,
  • C. Kice Brown
    ,
  • Jessica Paulson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • University of Iowa
    ,
  • Cardiovascular and Clinical Research Centers
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Pathophysiological characteristics differ between slow transit constipation (STC) and dyssynergic defecation, but whether psychological profiles and quality of life (QOL) are altered and whether they differ among these constipation subtypes are unknown. Methods: We prospectively evaluated psychological profiles and QOL in 76 patients with dyssynergia, 38 patients with STC, and 44 control subjects using the Revised 90-item Symptom Checklist and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. In addition, we examined the correlations of psychological and QOL domains with constipation symptoms and pathophysiological subtypes. Results: Symptom scores for hostility and paranoid ideation were higher (P<.001) in patients with dyssynergic defecation than in patients with STC and control subjects. Scores for other psychological domains were higher (P<.0001) in patients with dyssynergic defecation and those with STC than in control subjects. Most QOL subscores were impaired (P<.05) in patients with dyssynergic defecation and some were impaired in patients with STC as compared with control subjects, but the two patient groups did not differ on these. The QOL subscores were strongly correlated (rc≈.9) with the psychological subscores in patients with dyssynergic defecation and those with STC, although more QOL subscores among patients with dyssynergic defecation and more psychological subscores among patients with STC primarily contributed to the canonical correlations. A set of six commonly reported constipation symptoms showed significant correlations with QOL and psychological subscores, more so among patients with STC than among patients with dyssynergic defecation. Conclusions: Patients with dyssynergic defecation had greater psychological distress and impaired health-related QOL as compared with patients with STC and control subjects. Both patient groups were also more affected as compared with the control group. There was a strong correlation between psychological dysfunction and impaired QOL, and both also correlated with constipation symptoms.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 441-449 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Psychosomatic Research (Volume 63, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2007

Publication status

Published - 10/2007

ISSN

0022-3999

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 34648847070
  • PubMed: 17905054

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.49
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
66
SciVal
Paper percentile
91
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations

Funding Details

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health through Grant No. RO1 DK 57100-05 and by the National Center for Research Resources General Clinical Research Centers Program through Grant No. RR00059.
FundersFunding numbers
National Center for Research Resources General Clinical Research Centers Program
-
NIH
RO1 DK 57100-05
NIDDK
R01DK057100