Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Psychometric testing of the clinical nurse leader staff satisfaction instrument

  • Lee Anna Spiva(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Patricia L. Hart
    ,
  • Mary Lou Wesley
    ,
  • Erin Gallagher
    ,
  • Frank McVay
    ,
  • Jessica Waggoner
*Corresponding author for this work
  • WellStar Enterprise Support
    ,
  • Kennesaw State University
    ,
  • Sparrow Health System
    ,
  • WellStar Douglas Hospital
    ,
  • WellStar Windy Hill Hospital
    ,
  • Kennestone Hospital
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Patient care is changing rapidly with increased complexity of care, patient volumes, and financial constraints with rising health care costs and limited reimbursements. In response, the clinical nurse leader (CNL) role was developed. No appropriate instrument exists to measure staff satisfaction with the CNL role. This study describes the development and testing of an instrument designed to measure staff satisfaction with implementation of the CNL role. Methods: The psychometric properties and factor structure of the Clinical Nurse Leader Staff Satisfaction (CNLSS) instrument was examined. Results: A 2-factor solution was discovered for the CNLSS. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were acceptable for the subscales and instrument. Conclusion: The CNLSS is a valid and reliable instrument. Future research should focus on establishing test-retest reliability and construct validity.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 302-311 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Nursing Measurement (Volume 22, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2014

Publication status

Published - 2014

ISSN

1061-3749

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84907663526
  • PubMed: 25255680

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.30
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
citations
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
41
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
28
Citation count
3