Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Putting it all together: Options for intractable epilepsy: An updated algorithm on the use of epilepsy surgery and neurostimulation

  • Selim R. Benbadis(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Eric Geller
    ,
  • Philippe Ryvlin
    ,
  • Steven Schachter
    ,
  • James Wheless
    ,
  • Werner Doyle
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of South Florida
    ,
  • Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery at St. Barnabas
    ,
  • University of Lausanne
    ,
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    ,
  • Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center
    ,
  • New York University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

For drug-resistant epilepsy, nonpharmacologic treatments should be considered early rather than late. Of the nondrug treatments, only resective surgery can be curative. Neurostimulation is palliative, i.e., not expected to achieve a seizure-free outcome. While resective surgery is the goal, other options are necessary because the majority of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy are not surgical candidates, and others have seizures that fail to improve with surgery or have only partial improvement but not seizure freedom. Neurostimulation modalities include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), each with its own advantages, disadvantages, and side effects. In most scenarios, determined by noninvasive evaluation, especially EEG and MRI, several strategies are reasonable. For focal epilepsies, the choices are between resective surgery, with or without intracranial EEG, and all three modalities of neurostimulation. In situations where resective surgery is likely to result in seizure freedom, such as mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy or lesional focal epilepsy, resection (standard, laser, or radiofrequency) is preferred. For difficult cases like extratemporal nonlesional epilepsies, neurostimulation offers a less invasive option than resective surgery. For generalized and multifocal epilepsies, VNS is an option, RNS is not, and DBS has only limited evidence. “This article is part of the Supplement issue Neurostimulation for Epilepsy.”

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 33-38 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Epilepsy and Behavior (Volume 88)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/2018

Publication status

Published - 11/2018

ISSN

1525-5050

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85053616786
  • PubMed: 30241957

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.94
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
25
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
65
Mentions
1
Captures
164

Funding Details

S. Benbadis: serves as a consultant for LivaNova, Eisai, Greenwich, Lundbeck, Neuropace, Sunovion; is on the speakers bureau for LivaNova, Eisai, Greenwich, Lundbeck, Neuropace, Sunovion; has received grant support from Acorda, LivaNova, Greenwich, Lundbeck, Sepracor, Sunovion, UCB, Upsher-Smith. S. Schachter: received grant from LivaNova.
FundersFunding numbers
Upsher-Smith Laboratories
-
LivaNova PLC
-