Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Quality requirements for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in multi-institutional clinical trials

  • Y. Xiao(corresponding author)
    ,
  • F. Yin
    ,
  • Feng Ming Kong
    ,
  • J. Yue
    ,
  • J. Galvin
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    ,
  • RTOG/ACR
    ,
  • Duke University
    ,
  • ,
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
Scholary Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Conference contribution

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Related Event

Title

World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering

Event type

Other

Date

05/26/2012 - 05/31/2012

Location

BeijingChina

Abstract

Clinical evidence have shown SBRT to be a tolerable, efficacious, and promising non-invasive therapy. Randomized prospective studies comparing surgery vs. SBRT in early-stage lung cancer are proposed to further investigate the relative survival, quality of life, and cost characteristics of these treatment paradigms. Accreditation and dosimetry requirements were carefully vetted for RTOG SBRT trials. Advanced technologies introduced since have posed additional challenges. This study provides an overview of the quality requirements including those for the recently introduced technologies.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
Conference contribution

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 2284-2287 (4 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2013

Publication status

Published - 2013

Publication series

  • Publication series name: IFMBE Proceedings
    ISSN (Print): 1680-0737
    Volume: 39 IFMBE
9783642293047

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84876020076

Host publication title

World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
24