Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Rabies exposures and pre-exposure vaccination practices among individuals with an increased risk of rabies exposure in the United States

  • Jesse D. Blanton(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Emily Colwell
    ,
  • Cynthia L. Walden
    ,
  • Lessie M. Davis
    ,
  • Christine Hoang
    ,
  • Julie A. Legred
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Georgia
    ,
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    ,
  • National Animal Care and Control Association
    ,
  • National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association
    ,
  • AVMA
    ,
  • National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify knowledge and practices related to rabies vaccination and serologic monitoring among animal care workers in the United States. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SAMPLE 2,334 animal care workers (ie, veterinarians, veterinary technicians, animal control workers, and wildlife rehabilitators). PROCEDURES Participants were contacted through relevant professional organizations to participate in an anonymous web-based survey. The survey collected demographic and occupational information, animal handling and potential rabies exposure information, and individual rabies vaccination and serologic monitoring practices. Comparisons of animal bite and rabies exposure rates were made between occupational groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with rabies vaccination status and adherence to serologic monitoring recommendations. RESULTS Respondents reported 0.77 animal bites/person-year or 0.10 bites/1,000 animals handled. The overall rate of postexposure prophylaxis due to an occupational rabies exposure was 1.07/100 person-years. Veterinarians reported the highest rabies vaccination rate (98.7% [367/372]), followed by animal control workers (78.5% [344/438]), wildlife rehabilitators (78.2% [122/156]), and veterinary technicians (69.3% [937/1,352]). Respondents working for employers requiring rabies vaccination and serologic monitoring were 32.16 and 6.14 times, respectively, as likely to be vaccinated or have a current serologic monitoring status as were respondents working for employers without such policies. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that, given the high reported rates of animal bites and potential rabies exposures among animal care workers, improvements in rabies vaccination and serologic monitoring practices are needed.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1491-1502 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (Volume 252, Issue 12)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/15/2018

Publication status

Published - 06/15/2018

ISSN

0003-1488

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85048552210
  • PubMed: 29889644

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
11
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.89
SciVal
Author count
12
SciVal
citations
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
56

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
42
Citation count
13