Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Racial differences in prognostic value of adult height for biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy

  • Stephen J. Freedland(corresponding author)
    ,
  • William J. Aronson
    ,
  • Bruce Trock
    ,
  • Pinchas Cohen
    ,
  • Christopher J. Kane
    ,
  • Christopher L. Amling
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Johns Hopkins University
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • University of California at Los Angeles
    ,
  • University of California at San Francisco
    ,
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego
    ,
  • Stanford University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Purpose: Adult height, as a surrogate of childhood and adolescent hormone activity and diet, has been associated with the risk for development and death from prostate cancer in predominantly White populations. However, hormonal activity and diets vary between races. We examined whether height was significantly associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy and whether there was an interaction between height and race. Experimental Design: Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine if height significantly predicted biochemical progression among 1,503 men (450 Black and 1,053 White) treated with radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2003. We examined for possible interactions between height and race. Results: Taller men (>175.3 cm) were significantly younger (P = 0.001), treated in more recent years (P = 0.02), had more clinical stage T 1 disease (P = 0.001), and were less likely to have extraprostatic extension (P = 0.02) than shorter men (≤175.3 cm). Height was not significantly related to race, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations, biopsy or pathologic Gleason sum, positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node metastasis. Height was significantly associated with progression among Black men [relative risk (RR), 1.67; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.00-2.79] but not among White men (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.77-1.38). The interaction between race and height for predicting biochemical progression was statistically significant (P interaction = 0.05). Conclusions: There was an interaction between height and race in that height predicted progression for Black men but not for White men. The explanation for these findings is unclear, although lower insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 concentrations among Black men may be involved.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 7735-7742 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Clinical Cancer Research (Volume 11, Issue 21)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/01/2005

Publication status

Published - 11/01/2005

ISSN

1078-0432

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 27744477636
  • PubMed: 16278394

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
1
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
35

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
20
Citation count
1

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NICHD
R01HD047013