Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Radiographic recommendations for the primary dentition: comparison of general dentists and pediatric dentists.

  • Carole M Hanes(corresponding author)
    ,
  • D. R. Myers
    ,
  • J. C. Dushku
    ,
  • W. O. Thompson
    ,
  • L. C. Durham
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

A survey which included brief case histories and intraoral photos of four primary dentitions ranging from healthy to severely carious was mailed to a random sample of 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists. Radiographic options were listed, from which the dentist was to indicate all films needed for each child's examination. Surveys were received from 1273 (43%) dentists, including 713 (36%) general dentists and 560 (56%) pediatric dentists. The pediatric dentists recommended significantly more diagnostic radiographs than did the general dentists across all four primary dentition cases. This trend was apparent in the absence of clinically visible caries. When radiographs were recommended, bite-wing radiographs were the most frequently ordered films. The most frequently ordered combination among all respondents was bite-wing radiographs plus anterior periapical films. The results suggest that, frequently, neither general dentists nor pediatric dentists prescribe radiographs for the primary dentition patient that conform to the USDHHS guidelines for radiographic examination (1987).

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 212-216 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pediatric dentistry (Volume 12, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/1990

Publication status

Published - 07/1990

ISSN

0164-1263

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0025459348
  • PubMed: 2150224

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Captures
7
Citation count
10