Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Randomised clinical trials: Linaclotide phase 3 studies in IBS-C - A prespecified further analysis based on European Medicines Agency-specified endpoints

  • E. M.M. Quigley(corresponding author)
    ,
  • J. Tack
    ,
  • W. D. Chey
    ,
  • ,
  • J. Fortea
    ,
  • M. Falques
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University College Cork
    ,
  • KU Leuven
    ,
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    ,
  • ,
  • Almirall, S.A
    ,
  • Forest Laboratories, Inc
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background Treatment options that improve overall symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) are lacking. Aim A prespecified further analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist, in patients with IBS-C, based on efficacy parameters prespecified for European Medicines Agency (EMA) submission. Methods Two randomised, double-blind, multicentre Phase 3 trials investigated once-daily linaclotide (290 μg) for 12 weeks (Trial 31) or 26 weeks (Trial 302) in patients with IBS-C. Prespecified primary endpoints were the EMA-recommended co-primary endpoints: (i) 12-week abdominal pain/discomfort responders [≥30% reduction in mean abdominal pain and/or discomfort score (11-point scales), with neither worsening from baseline, for ≥6 weeks] and (ii) 12-week IBS degree-of-relief responders (symptoms 'considerably' or 'completely' relieved for ≥6 weeks). Results Overall, 803 (Trial 31) and 805 patients (Trial 302) were randomised. A significantly greater proportion of linaclotide-treated vs. placebo-treated patients were 12-week abdominal pain/discomfort responders (Trial 31: 54.8% vs. 41.8%; Trial 302: 54.1% vs. 38.5%; P < 0.001) and IBS degree-of-relief responders (Trial 31: 37.0% vs. 18.5%; Trial 302: 39.4% vs. 16.6%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, significantly more linaclotide- vs. placebo-treated patients were responders for ≥13 weeks in Trial 302 (abdominal pain/discomfort: 53.6% vs. 36.0%; IBS degree-of-relief: 37.2% vs. 16.9%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of sustained responders (co-primary endpoint responders plus responders for ≥2 of the last 4 weeks of treatment) was also significantly greater with linaclotide vs. placebo in both trials (P < 0.001). Conclusion Linaclotide treatment significantly improved abdominal pain/discomfort and degree-of-relief of IBS-C symptoms compared with placebo over 12 and 26 weeks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifiers: NCT00948818 and NCT00938717).

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 49-61 (13 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Volume 37, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2013

Publication status

Published - 01/2013

ISSN

0269-2813

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84870601331
  • PubMed: 23116208

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
7.44
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
citations
103
SciVal
Paper percentile
98
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
135
Captures
93