Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Ranking valid topologies of the secondary structure elements using a constraint graph

  • Kamal Al Nasr
    ,
  • Desh Ranjan
    ,
  • Mohammad Zubair
    ,
  • Jing He(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Old Dominion University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Electron cryo-microscopy is a fast advancing biophysical technique to derive three-dimensional structures of large protein complexes. Using this technique, many density maps have been generated at intermediate resolution such as 610 Å resolution. Although it is challenging to derive the backbone of the protein directly from such density maps, secondary structure elements such as helices and β-sheets can be computationally detected. Our work in this paper provides an approach to enumerate the top-ranked possible topologies instead of enumerating the entire population of the topologies. This approach is particularly practical for large proteins. We developed a directed weighted graph, the topology graph, to represent the secondary structure assignment problem. We prove that the problem of finding the valid topology with the minimum cost is NP hard. We developed an O(N2 2N) dynamic programming algorithm to identify the topology with the minimum cost. The test of 15 proteins suggests that our dynamic programming approach is feasible to work with proteins of much larger size than we could before. The largest protein in the test contains 18 helical sticks detected from the density map out of 33 helices in the protein.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 415-430 (16 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2011

Publication status

Published - 06/2011

ISSN

0219-7200

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 79959208798
  • PubMed: 21714133

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
8
Citation count
31