Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to subjectively quantify the degree of scratching and smudging that had taken place in the junior clinic in the 9 months following the implementation of digital radiology; (2) to compare the findings with a previously published report; and (3) to identify areas in the protocol and training that can be refined to minimize future scratching and smudging. Methods: Seven sets of blank clinical photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) plates were scanned after exposing them at 65 kV and 7 mA for 0.80 s. Scanned plates were lightly wiped with a soft cloth and alcohol, repackaged in plastic sleeves, re-exposed and rescanned. The two sets of resulting images were subjectively rated independently by two investigators for artefacts and placed in five categories. Results: Of all the images, approximately 75% were rated in the top 3 categories (most readable), leaving 17% and 8% in the poor and unsatisfactory categories, respectively. Mean rated values of the two image sets (before and after wiping) were not statistically different, but ratings slightly improved after cleaning the plates. Conclusions: Wiping all plates to remove surface contamination may not always be necessary or desirable. Systems that are designed to minimize handling of the plates may help minimize scratching of them.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 179-183 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (Volume 39, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2010

Publication status

Published - 03/2010

ISSN

0250-832X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 77749264223
  • PubMed: 20203281

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.19
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
11
SciVal
Paper percentile
65
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
17
Captures
34