Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Reasons for Initiation and Discontinuation of Pharmacological Therapies for Osteoporosis in Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders

  • Brian Le
    ,
  • Cara Ray
    ,
  • Beverly Gonzalez
    ,
  • Scott Miskevics
    ,
  • Frances M. Weaver
    ,
  • Michael Priebe
*Corresponding author for this work
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • Medical College of Georgia
    ,
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    ,
  • Northwestern University
    ,
  • Northeastern Illinois University
    ,
  • Loyola University Chicago
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Introduction: Medications for osteoporosis have not been reported to reduce fracture rates in patients with spinal cord injury and disorders (SCI/D), yet these medications are still prescribed. Clinical decision-making underscoring the initiation and discontinuation of osteoporosis medications in SCI/D remains poorly understood. Methodology: Veterans with a SCI/D with at least one prescription for an osteoporosis medication (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide) who received healthcare within Veterans Affairs (VA) from 2005 to 2015 were identified using VA administrative databases. A 10% subsample of Veterans was selected for electronic health record review. Results: Two hundred and sixty-seven Veterans with 330 prescriptions underwent electronic health record review. Bisphosphonates were the most frequently prescribed medication for osteoporosis (n = 223, 67.6%). Of the 187 Veterans with prescriptions for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis, the primary reason for initiation was Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan with osteopenia or osteoporosis (n = 119, 63.6% of Veterans), primarily at the hip (81.0% of DXAs). The majority (79.0%) of DXAs were “screening tests,” with SCI/D being the sole reason for the scan. Fractures (n = 51, 27.3%) and fall risk concerns (n = 29, 15.5%) were other major reasons for initiation. On average, oral bisphosphonates were filled for <3 yr, with medication-related side effects (n = 23, 15.8% of bisphosphonates discontinued), predominately gastrointestinal (n = 17, 73.9% of reported side effects), the most common reason for discontinuation. Drug holidays occurred in 14.3% of 35 oral bisphosphonates used for ≥5 yr. No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were found. There was one case of an atypical femoral fracture which could not be confirmed. Conclusions: The decision to initiate pharmacological therapies in SCI/D is primarily based on osteopenia or osteoporosis at the hip by screening DXAs. Gastrointestinal side effects are the major reason for discontinuation of oral bisphosphonates. New therapies for osteoporosis in SCI/D are needed.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 67-77 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Densitometry (Volume 24, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 01/01/2019
  • Published - 01/01/2021

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2021

ISSN

1094-6950

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85067929668
  • PubMed: 31262561

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
1
SciVal
Paper percentile
92
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
4
Captures
44

Funding Details

This work was funded by the Department of Defense (DOD) Grant #SC150092 and Health Services Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs Grant#: 1 I01 HX 002090-01A2 . The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. This work was funded by the Department of Defense (DOD) Grant #SC150092 and Health Services Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs Grant#: 1 I01 HX 002090-01A2. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.