Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Impact of multidisciplinary care on processes of cancer care: A multi-institutional study

  • Eberechukwu Onukwugha
    ,
  • Nicholas J. Petrelli
    ,
  • Kathleen M. Castro
    ,
  • James F. Gardner
    ,
  • Jinani Jayasekera
    ,
  • Olga Goloubeva
  • University of Maryland, College Park
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    ,
  • Institute of Living
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Purpose The role of multidisciplinary care (MDC) on cancer care processes is not fully understood. We investigated the impact of MDC on the processes of care at cancer centers within the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP). Methods The study used data from patients diagnosed with stage IIB to III rectal cancer, stage III colon cancer, and stage III non-small-cell lung cancer at 14 NCCCP cancer centers from 2007 to 2012. We used an MDC development assessment tool-with levels ranging from evolving MDC (low) to achieving excellence (high)-to measure the level of MDC implementation in seven MDC areas, such as case planning and physician engagement. Descriptive statistics and cluster-adjusted regression models quantified the association between MDC implementation and processes of care, including time from diagnosis to treatment receipt. Results A total of 1,079 patients were examined. Compared with patients with colon cancer treated at cancer centers reporting lowMDCscores, time to treatment receiptwas shorter for patients with colon cancer treated at cancer centers reporting high or moderate MDC scores for physician engagement (hazard ratio [HR] for high physician engagement, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.70 to 4.17; HR for moderate physician engagement, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.89) and longer for patients with colon cancer treated at cancer centers reporting high 2MDC scores for case planning (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.85). Results for patients with rectal cancer were qualitatively similar, and there was no statistically significant difference among patients with lung cancer. Conclusion MDC implementation level was associated with processes of care, and direction of association varied across MDC assessment areas.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e157-e168

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Oncology Practice (Volume 12, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2016

Publication status

Published - 02/2016

ISSN

1554-7477

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84958241003
  • PubMed: 26464497

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.78
SciVal
Author count
15
SciVal
citations
17
SciVal
Paper percentile
83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.03
Fractional count
29
Fractional count
0.97
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
25
Captures
62
Mentions
1