Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Regional Variation in the Denial of Reimbursement for Bone Mineral Density Testing Among US Medicare Beneficiaries

  • Jeffrey R. Curtis(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Andrew J. Laster
    ,
  • David J. Becker
    ,
  • ,
  • Lisa C. Gary
    ,
  • Meredith L. Kilgore
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    ,
  • Arthritis and Osteoporosis Consultants of the Carolinas
    ,
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • Vanderbilt University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Although the Bone Mass Measurement Act outlines the indications for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for US Medicare beneficiaries, the specifics regarding the appropriate ICD-9 codes to use for covered indications have not been specified by Medicare and are sometimes ambiguous. We describe the extent to which DXA reimbursement was denied by gender and age of beneficiary, ICD-9 code submitted, time since previous DXA, whether the scan was performed in the physician's office and local Medicare carrier. Using Medicare administrative claims data from 1999 to 2005, we studied a 5% national sample of beneficiaries age ≥65 yr with part A + B coverage who were not health maintenance organization enrollees. We identified central DXA claims and evaluated the relationship between the factors listed above and reimbursement for central DXA (CPT code 76075). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between DXA reimbursement, ICD-9 diagnosis code, and Medicare carrier. For persons who had no DXA in 1999 or 2000 and who had 1 in 2001 or 2002, the proportion of DXA claims denied was 5.3% for women and 9.1% for men. For repeat DXAs performed within 23 mo, the proportion denied was approximately 19% and did not differ by sex. Reimbursement varied by more than 6-fold according to the ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted. For repeat DXAs performed at <23 mo, the proportion of claims denied ranged from 2% to 43%, depending on Medicare carrier. Denial of Medicare reimbursement for DXA varies significantly by sex, time since previous DXA, ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted, place of service (office vs facility), and local Medicare carrier. Greater guidance and transparency in coding policies are needed to ensure that DXA as a covered service is reimbursed for Medicare beneficiaries with the appropriate indications.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 568-574 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Densitometry (Volume 11, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2008

Publication status

Published - 10/2008

ISSN

1094-6950

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 55549128893
  • PubMed: 18789740

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.54
SciVal
Author count
11
SciVal
citations
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
58
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.09
Fractional count
10
Fractional count
0.91
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
8
Captures
13

Funding Details

This research was supported by a contract between UAB and Amgen, Inc. Only the authors from UAB had access to the Medicare data used. The analysis, presentation, and interpretation of the results were solely the responsibility of the authors. Some of the investigators (JRC, KGS) also receive salary support from the National Institutes of Health (AR053351, AR052361), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18 HS016956), and the Arthritis Foundation (JRC).
FundersFunding numbers
Amgen, Inc.
-
NIH
AR052361
NIAMS
K23AR053351
AHRQ
U18 HS016956
Arthritis Foundation
-
UAB
-
JRC
-