Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for evaluating the hip musculature

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of three normalization methods for analyzing hip abductor activation during rehabilitation exercises. Thirteen healthy subjects performed three open kinetic chain and three closed kinetic chain hip abductor exercises. Surface EMG activity for the gluteus medius was collected during each exercise and normalized based on a maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), mean dynamic (m-DYN), and peak dynamic activity (pk-DYN). Intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs), intersubject coefficients of variation (CVs), and intrasubject CVs were then calculated for each normalization method. MVIC ICCs exceeded 0.93 for all exercises. M-DYN and pk-DYN ICCs exceeded 0.85 for all exercises except for the sidelying abduction exercise. Intersubject CVs ranged from 55% to 77% and 19% to 61% for the MVIC and dynamic methods, respectively. Intrasubject CVs ranged from 11% to 22% for all exercises under all normalization methods. The MVIC method provided the highest measurement reliability for determining differences in activation amplitudes between hip abductor exercises in healthy subjects. Future research should determine if these same results would apply to a symptomatic patient population.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 102-111 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (Volume 17, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2007

Publication status

Published - 02/2007

ISSN

1050-6411

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33750976379
  • PubMed: 16423539
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-4298-4779/work/50640007

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
105
SciVal
FWCI
2.22
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
95
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
148
Captures
284