Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Residency selection: Do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Henry Ford Health System
    ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • St. George's University Grenada
    ,
  • Saint Barnabas Medical Center
    ,
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the practices and perceptions of US residency programme directors (PDs) and residency applicants with reference to the use of social media and Internet resources in the resident doctor selection process. Methods A survey was distributed via e-mail (SurveyMonkey ®) to 2592 PDs of programmes in 22 specialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A separate survey was distributed to all residency candidates applying for postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) positions at the Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey. Results A total of 1200 (46.3%) PDs completed the survey. Overall, 16.3% (n=196) of respondents reported visiting Internet resources to gain more information about applicants, 38.1% (74 of 194) of whom had ranked an applicant lower as a result. American medical graduates (AMGs), US international medical graduates (USIMGs) and non-USIMGs all felt that performance on Step 1 of the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was a critical aspect of a residency application. More AMGs than USIMGs and non-USIMGs believed that PDs made use of social media resources when evaluating applicants and that their online profiles might influence their rankings. Conclusions Residency candidates universally understand the importance of USMLE Step 1 scores in maintaining a competitive application. However, significant differences exist among AMGs, USIMGs and non-USIMGs in their perceptions of the value of other applicant criteria, which may place some applicants at a disadvantage. A small but growing number of PDs currently use Internet resources to learn more about applicants and base their recruitment decisions in part on the information they encounter. At present, applicants are generally unaware of the implications their online activity may have on their selection for residency. Content guideline programmes that raise awareness of the possible impact of social media on the residency recruitment process are needed and should be delivered early in medical education.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 491-500 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Medical education (Volume 46, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2012

Publication status

Published - 05/2012

ISSN

0308-0110

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84860248699
  • PubMed: 22515757

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
15
SciVal
FWCI
1.34
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
73
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
29
Captures
105