Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Results of phase 3 of the CATIE schizophrenia trial

  • T. Scott Stroup(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Jeffrey A. Lieberman
    ,
  • ,
  • Sonia M. Davis
    ,
  • Marvin S. Swartz
    ,
  • Richard S.E. Keefe
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    ,
  • Columbia University
    ,
  • ,
  • IQVIA Inc.
    ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    ,
  • Yale University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study examined the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who had discontinued antipsychotic treatment in phases 1 and 2 were eligible for phase 3, in which they selected one of nine antipsychotic regimens with the help of their study doctor. We describe the characteristics of the patients who selected each treatment option and their outcomes. Method: Two hundred and seventy patients entered phase 3. The open-label treatment options were monotherapy with oral aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, long-acting injectable fluphenazine decanoate, or a combination of any two of these treatments. Results: Few patients selected fluphenazine decanoate (n = 9) or perphenazine (n = 4). Similar numbers selected each of the other options (range 33-41). Of the seven common choices, those who selected clozapine and combination antipsychotic treatment were the most symptomatic, and those who selected aripiprazole and ziprasidone had the highest body mass index. Symptoms improved for all groups, although the improvements were modest for the groups starting with relatively mild levels of symptoms. Side effect profiles of the medications varied considerably but medication discontinuations due to intolerability were rare (7% overall). Conclusions: Patients and their doctors made treatment selections based on clinical factors, including severity of symptoms, response to prior treatments, and physical health status. Fluphenazine decanoate was rarely used among those with evidence of treatment non-adherence and clozapine was underutilized for those with poor previous response. Combination antipsychotic treatment warrants further study.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-12 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Schizophrenia Research (Volume 107, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2009

Publication status

Published - 01/2009

ISSN

0920-9964

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 58149131304
  • PubMed: 19027269

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
106
SciVal
FWCI
3.87
SciVal
Author count
9
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.11
Fractional count
8
Fractional count
0.89
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
169
Citation count
140

Funding Details

Funding for this study was provided by NIMH contract N01 MH 90001; the NIMH was involved in all phases of the study. Study drugs were donated by the manufacturers; the companies were not involved in designing or conducting the study, analyzing or interpreting the data, or deciding to submit the paper for publication.
FunderFunding numbers
NIMH
NO1 MH90001, K23MH067002