Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Review of a large clinical series: Focused bedside echocardiography in the surgical intensive care unit: Comparison of 3 methods to estimate cardiac index

  • Mark Gunst
    ,
  • Kazuhide Matsushima
    ,
  • Jason Sperry
    ,
  • Vafa Ghaemmaghami
    ,
  • Melissa Robinson
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • United States Air Force Academy
    ,
  • Pennsylvania State University
    ,
  • University of Pittsburgh
    ,
  • Banner Good Samaritan Med Center
    ,
  • University of California at Davis
    ,
  • University Medical Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

We sought to determine which of 3 methods used to evaluate cardiac index (CI) is the most accurate using focused bedside echocardiography (ECHO). We hypothesized that the fractional shortening (FS) method would provide a more accurate estimate of CI than the left ventricular outflow tract/velocity-time integral (LVOT/VTI) or Simpson's methods. This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the surgical ICU of an urban level 1 trauma center utilizing all patients with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in place. Three surgical intensive care unit (SICU) faculty and 3 fellows underwent focused cardiac ultrasound training. Focused ECHO exams-bedside echocardiographic assessment in trauma/critical care (BEAT)- were performed using the Sonosite portable ultrasound device (Bothall, Washington). Stroke volume (SV) measurements were prospectively obtained on all trauma/SICU patients, with a PAC in place, using FS, LVOT/VTI, and Simpson's methods. The investigators were blinded to the PAC data. From each measurement, CI was calculated and categorized as low, normal, or high, based on a normal range of 2.4 to 4.0 L/min per m2. Each CI obtained from the PAC was similarly categorized. The association between the BEAT and PAC estimates of CI was evaluated for each method using chi-square goodness of fit. Eighty five BEAT exams were performed on consecutive SICU patients, 56% were on trauma and 44% on emergency general surgery patients. There was a statistically significant association between the CI estimate using the FS method (P =.012), but not the LVOT/VTI (P =.33) or Simpson's method (P =.74). Our data showed a significant association between the PAC estimate of CI and our estimate using the FS method. The other methods were difficult to obtain, subjective, and inaccurate. Fractional shortening was the method of choice to estimate CI for the BEAT exam performed by intensivists in SICU patients.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 255-260 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (Volume 26, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2011

Publication status

Published - 07/2011

ISSN

0885-0666

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80052098496
  • PubMed: 21764768

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.50
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
citations
13
SciVal
Paper percentile
69
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Captures
62