Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Rey's 15-Item Visual Memory Test for the Detection of Malingering: Normative Observations on Patients With Neurological Disorders

  • Gregory P. Lee(corresponding author)
    ,
  • David W. Loring
    ,
  • Roy C. Martin
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Rey (1964) devised a simple 15-item (3 columns × 5 rows) visual memory test to detect faking or exaggeration of memory complaints. To gather normative observations on patients with genuine memory disorders, the authors administered this test to 100 temporal lobe epilepsy inpatients (TLEs) who showed defective performance on at least 1 of 4 standardized memory tests. To determine whether outpatients with neurological disorders (OPs) would produce a distribution of scores similar to those of TLEs, Rey's 3 × 5 was administered to 56 OPs who had been referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Sixteen OPs in litigation were excluded from the outpatient sample because motivation for optimal performance could not be assumed. A Rey's 3 × 5 score of 7 was at or below the 5th percentile of both TLE and OP score distributions. Further, OPs in litigation performed significantly worse on the test than did both TLEs and OPs not in litigation, who did not differ from each other. Results suggest that using a cutoff score of 7 on Rey's 3 × 5 memory test may prove useful in alerting the clinician to possible factitious memory complaints.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 43-46 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Psychological Assessment (Volume 4, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/1992

Publication status

Published - 03/1992

ISSN

1040-3590

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0005137930

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
23
Citation count
88