Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Right ventricular volume estimation with an ellipsoidal shell model and two-plane magnetic resonance imaging

  • Stewart Denslow(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Henry B. Wiles
    ,
  • Lisa F. McKellar
    ,
  • Nancy A. Wright
    ,
  • Paul C. Gillette
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Medical University of South Carolina
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

In patients with congenital and other heart disease, measurement of right ventricular (RV) volumes would be as useful as left ventricular (LV) volume measurement has been for diseases of the LV. Model-based techniques have had limited success. Simpson's rule (multislice) techniques require lengthy data collection and reduction. We investigated a technique for volume estimation with a new but simple geometric model. A retrospective patient study compared RV volumes from modal-based calculations with dual-plane cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multislice calclations with biplane cineanglography. Linear regression showed high correlation (r = 0.98, standard error of the estimate = 11.8 ml) between the two techniques, with a slope near unity. Comparison of calculated right and left stroke volumes also showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate = 10.4 ml) and a slope near unity. It is concluded that the ellipsoidal shell model can be used to estimate RV volume reliably and practically with dual-plane MR imaging.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 782-790 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Heart Journal (Volume 129, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/1995

Publication status

Published - 04/1995

ISSN

0002-8703

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0028920991
  • PubMed: 7900632

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
2
Citation count
19