Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Risks versus benefits of different types of long-acting injectable antipsychotics

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Duke University
    ,
  • North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Since their introduction into clinical practice in the early 1960s, long-acting depot antipsychotics have been widely used as maintenance therapy for patients with schizophrenia. The improved pharmacokinetics of injectable long-acting antipsychotic therapies have provided more reliable drug delivery and reduced differences in peak and trough plasma levels of the drug. Studies that have compared short-acting oral antipsychotics with long-acting injectable antipsychotics, although imperfect, support injectable antipsychotics as having real benefit over oral antipsychotics on patient outcome owing largely to improved adherence. If patients forget or refuse to take their prescribed oral medications, weeks or months may go by before they experience an exacerbation; the effects of nonadherence become apparent too late to preempt the problem. On the other hand, if a patient fails to show up for an injection, the problem of nonadherence can be immediately addressed. When injectable medi-cation is combined with an active psychosocial treatment program that will respond assertively to nonadherence, relapse rates may be reduced. By preventing or delaying relapse, consistent treatment can improve the patient's quality of life and lead to an overall reduction in the cost of care.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 15-18 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Volume 67, Issue SUPPL. 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2006

Publication status

Published - 2006

ISSN

0160-6689

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33744793769
  • PubMed: 16822092

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.15
SciVal
Author count
1
SciVal
citations
86
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Citation count
110
Captures
94
Mentions
7