Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Safety and efficacy of talacotuzumab plus decitabine or decitabine alone in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not eligible for chemotherapy: results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 study

  • Pau Montesinos(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Gail J. Roboz
    ,
  • Claude Eric Bulabois
    ,
  • Marion Subklewe
    ,
  • Uwe Platzbecker
    ,
  • Yishai Ofran
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
    ,
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
    ,
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
    ,
  • Universite Joseph Fourier
    ,
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
    ,
  • Leipzig University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Talacotuzumab, a humanized anti-CD123 monoclonal antibody, was evaluated in combination with decitabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. A multicenter, phase 2/3 study was initiated to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of talacotuzumab (Part A) followed by an open-label, randomized comparison of talacotuzumab in combination with decitabine versus decitabine alone to assess achievement of complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS) in Part B. Ten patients were enrolled in Part A and 316 in Part B; the results presented here are based on a database lock on January 25, 2018. Part A confirmed the RP2D of talacotuzumab to be 9 mg/kg. In Part B, CR was achieved in 12/80 (15%) patients receiving combination therapy and in 9/82 (11%) patients receiving decitabine alone (odds ratio: 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–3.6; p = 0.44). Median (95% CI) OS was 5.36 (4.27–7.95) months for combination therapy versus 7.26 (6.47–8.64) months for decitabine alone (hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.79–1.37; p = 0.78). Combination therapy showed no improvement in efficacy versus decitabine alone, resulting in the Independent Data Monitoring Committee’s recommendation of early termination of enrollment and discontinuation of talacotuzumab treatment.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 62-74 (13 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Leukemia (Volume 35, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2020
  • Published - 01/2021

Publication status

Published - 01/2021

ISSN

0887-6924

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85081676423
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8636-1071/work/86814492
  • PubMed: 32203138

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.04
Fractional count
24
Fractional count
0.96
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
FWCI
17.98
SciVal
Author count
25
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
92
Captures
94

Funding Details

Funding The study was sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Conflict of interest GJR extended consulting or advisory services to Agios, Amphivena, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Glax-oSmithKline, Janssen, MEI Pharma, Roche, Shire, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celator, Celgene, Cellectis, CTI, Genoptix, Juno Therapeutics, MedImmune, Novartis, Onconova Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, received research funding from Abbvie (Inst), Agios (Inst), Astex Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Celgene (Inst), CTI (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), MEI Pharma (Inst), Moffitt (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Onconova Therapeutics (Inst) Pfizer (Inst), Sunesis Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Tensha Therapeutics (Inst) and received travel, accommodations and other expenses from AstraZeneca, Shire, Astellas Pharma, Celator, Incyte, Roche, Amphivena, MEI Pharma, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Juno Therapeutics. C-EB received support from Amgen, Astellas, Biosafe, Celgene, Chugai, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gentium, Gilead, Janssen, Keocyt, Macopharma, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Mundipharma, OrpheliPharm, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sandoz, Sanofi, Spectrum, Takeda, Teva, Therakos, Vifor pharma. MS received research funding from Amgen and Roche. MS received either travel reimbursements or consultant fees from Amgen, Celgene, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics. UP has received honoraria from Celgene Corporation. AW received honoraria from Celgene. HD provided consultancy services to Agios, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celator, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Sunesis, and Tolero, and received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Arog Pharmaceuticals research. JC received support from Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Teva and consultancy support from Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Pfizer. DAP is a member of advisory boards for Celgene and Pfizer. C.T.J. is an equity holder in Leuchemix Inc GO provided consultancy services to Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Sunesis, Celgene, Karypharm, and Amgen, and received research support from Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Celgene, Immunogene, and Becton Dickinson. AHW provided consultancy services to Novartis, Celgene, Servier, Abbvie, Roche, Amgen, and CTI, and received research funding from Abbvie, Novartis, Celgene, Servier, Ariad, and Amgen. LX, IS, FH, and JSL are employees of Janssen Research and development and may hold company stocks.
FundersFunding number
Janssen Research and Development, LLC
-
NCI
P30CA008748
Amgen
-
BMS
-
Pfizer
-
Roche
-
en:JRD
-
Gilead Sciences
-
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
-
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
-
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-
Celgene
-
AbbVie
-
Boehringer Ingelheim
-
CTI
-
Takeda Canada
-
Astellas Pharma
-
Vifor Pharma Management
-
Servier
-
Novartis Farmacéutica
-
Sanofi España
-