Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Screening for skin cancer US preventive services task force recommendation statement

  • Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo(corresponding author)
    ,
  • David C. Grossman
    ,
  • Susan J. Curry
    ,
  • Karina W. Davidson
    ,
  • Mark H. Ebell
    ,
  • John W. Epling
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at San Francisco
    ,
  • Group Health Cooperative
    ,
  • University of Iowa
    ,
  • Columbia University
    ,
  • ,
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Importance Basal and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common types of cancer in the United States and represent the vast majority of all cases of skin cancer; however, they rarely result in death or substantial morbidity, whereas melanoma skin cancer has notably higher mortality rates. In 2016, an estimated 76 400 US men and women will develop melanoma and 10 100 will die from the disease. OBJECTIVE To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for skin cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination in reducing skin cancer morbidity and mortality and death from any cause; its potential harms, including any harms resulting from associated diagnostic follow-up; its test characteristics when performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier detection of skin cancer compared with usual care. FINDINGS Evidence to assess the net benefit of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination is limited. Direct evidence on the effectiveness of screening in reducing melanoma morbidity and mortality is limited to a single fair-quality ecologic study with important methodological limitations. Information on harms is similarly sparse. The potential for harm clearly exists, including a high rate of unnecessary biopsies, possibly resulting in cosmetic or, more rarely, functional adverse effects, and the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adults (I statement).

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 429-435 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association (Volume 316, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/26/2016

Publication status

Published - 07/26/2016

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84979763447
  • PubMed: 27458948

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
17.37
SciVal
Author count
17
SciVal
citations
126
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.06
Fractional count
16
Fractional count
0.94
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
196
Mentions
17
Citation count
275
Social media
62

Funding Details

The USPSTF is an independent, voluntary body. The US Congress mandates that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) support the operations of the USPSTF.
FundersFunding number
USPSTF
-
NCI
P30CA086862
AHRQ
-