Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Shooting for Accuracy: Comparing Data Sources on Mass Murder

*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Central Florida
    ,
  • University of Memphis
    ,
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation
    ,
  • Lakeland College
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Abstract

Although researchers have questioned their coverage and accuracy, the media routinely are used as sources of data on mass murder in the United States. Databases compiled from media sources such as newspaper and network news programs include the New York Police Department's Active Shooters file, the Brady Campaign Mass Casualty Shootings data set, and the Mother Jones database. Conversely, official crime data have been underutilized by researchers who study mass murder (for exceptions, see Duwe, 2007; Fox & Levin, 1998). In this study, we compare similarities and differences for mass murder cases in the United States as portrayed by selected mass media sources. Then, we turn our focus to a comparison of the Uniform Crime Reports' (UCR) Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Our primary focus is on mass murders involving four or more fatalities-not including the perpetrator-that have occurred between 2001 and 2010. Implications for enhancing the comprehensiveness and quality of mass murder data with the goal of increasing their usefulness for guiding prevention and risk mitigation efforts also are discussed.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 105-124 (20 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Homicide Studies (Volume 18, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2014

Publication status

Published - 02/2014

ISSN

1088-7679

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84892386154
  • ORCID: /0000-0003-1897-6370/work/67684061

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
2.86
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
34
SciVal
Paper percentile
90
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
1
Usage
111
Citation count
70
Captures
59