Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Similarities and differences in spatial learning and object recognition between young male C57Bl/6J mice and sprague-dawley rats

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Mice and rats are often used interchangeably in neuroscience research. However, species differences in brain structure and connectivity exist within the medial temporal lobe circuits that contribute to learning and memory. The hippocampus in particular contributes to both spatial learning and recognition memory, but the extent to which rats and mice are comparable in these two cognitive domains remains unclear. To evaluate potential species differences in spatial memory and object recognition, young adult male Sprague-Dawley rats and male C57Bl/6J mice were tested in the water maze and novel object recognition tasks. Following six days of training, with four trials per day, there was no difference in the ability of rats and mice to learn the location of a hidden platform. However, rats performed better than mice on the probe trial, indicative of superior retention. In the novel object preference test, no species differences in recognition memory were detected, although rats spent more time exploring the arena and took longer to approach the objects. These observations suggest that while species differences in spatial memory retention are present, they do not correlate with differences in object recognition memory.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 791-795 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Behavioral Neuroscience (Volume 125, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2011

Publication status

Published - 10/2011

ISSN

0735-7044

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80053597366
  • PubMed: 21942439

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
25
SciVal
FWCI
0.47
SciVal
Author count
1
SciVal
Paper percentile
81

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
33
Captures
61

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NIA
F31AG024690