Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Strain differences in response to traumatic brain injury in long-evans compared to sprague-dawley rats

  • Arlene A. Tan
    ,
  • Andrea Quigley
    ,
  • Douglas C. Smith
    ,
  • Michael R. Hoane
  • Southern Illinois University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

The selected strain of rodent used in experimental models of traumatic brain injury is typically dependent upon the experimental questions asked and the familiarity of the investigator with a specific rodent strain. This archival study compares the injury responsiveness and recovery profiles of two popular outbred strains, the Long-Evans (LE) and the Sprague-Dawley (SD), after brain injury induced by lateral fluid percussion injury (LFPI). General findings include a significantly longer duration of unconsciousness in LE rats, but similar durations of apnea. Both strains displayed the same level of initial FPI-induced behavioral deficits, followed by a more rapid rate of functional recovery in SD rats. Cortical volume loss was not significantly different, but close inspection of the data suggests the possibility that LE rats may be more susceptible to damage in the hemisphere contralateral to the injury site than are SD rats. It is hoped that the information provided here encourages greater attention to the subtle differences and similarities between strains in future pre-clinical efficacy studies of traumatic brain injury.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 539-548 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Neurotrauma (Volume 26, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/01/2009

Publication status

Published - 04/01/2009

ISSN

0897-7151

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 64849109004
  • PubMed: 19216636

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.89
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
30
SciVal
Paper percentile
82
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
37
Citation count
41

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NINDS
R15NS045647