Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Strategies for Managing Imaging Utilization

  • Mark Bernardy
    ,
  • Christopher G. Ullrich
    ,
  • James V. Rawson
    ,
  • Bibb Allen
    ,
  • James H. Thrall
    ,
  • Kathryn J. Keysor(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Conyers
    ,
  • Charlotte Radiology, PA
    ,
  • ,
  • Trinity Medical Center
    ,
  • Birmingham Radiological Group, PC
    ,
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Imaging represents a substantial and growing portion of the costs of American health care. When performed correctly and for the right reasons, medical imaging facilitates quality medical care that brings value to both patients and payers. When used incorrectly because of inappropriate economic incentives, unnecessary patient demands, or provider concerns for medical-legal risk, imaging costs can increase without increasing diagnostic yields. A number of methods have been tried to manage imaging utilization and achieve the best medical outcomes for patients without incurring unnecessary costs. The best method should combine a prospective approach; be transparent, evidence based, and unobtrusive to the doctor-patient relationship and provide for education and continuous quality improvement. Combining the proper utilization of imaging and its inherent cost reduction, with improved quality through credentialing and accreditation, achieves the highest value and simultaneous best outcomes for patients.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 844-850 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American College of Radiology (Volume 6, Issue 12)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2009

Publication status

Published - 12/2009

ISSN

1546-1440

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 71849103681
  • PubMed: 19945039

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.32
SciVal
Author count
14
SciVal
citations
42
SciVal
Paper percentile
87
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.07
Fractional count
13
Fractional count
0.93
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
62
Captures
69