Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Structuring a framework for public health performance-based budgeting: A georgia case study

  • Valerie A. Hepburn(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Robert Eger
    ,
  • Jungbu Kim
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Georgia State University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The ability of public health to meet its functional mandates of assessment, assurance, and policy development footline is driven by the system's capacity to meet basic financing needs. To do so, state and local public health leaders must be able to articulate financing needs in terms that are understandable to policy makers and that link funding to anticipated community impact, benefit, and performance. "Rational" budgeting demands imposed by performance-centered budgeting in the states have proved particularly challenging for public health programs. This Georgia-based case study explores one approach for program budgeting in state and regional public health systems and finds the framework to be normatively sound and appropriately descriptive of the "core functions" of public health. The structure clearly distinguishes between personal health services and population health and allows for the future establishment of measurable program targets, an essential feature of a performance-centered budgeting system.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 173-179 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (Volume 13, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2007

Publication status

Published - 2007

ISSN

1078-4659

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33847051601
  • PubMed: 17299322

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.19
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
39
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
6
Captures
34