Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Teacher and Student Language Practices and Ideologies in a Third-Grade Two-Way Dual Language Program Implementation

  • Kathryn I. Henderson
    ,
  • Deborah K. Palmer(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth exploration of the language ecologies of two classrooms attempting to implement a two-way dual language (TWDL) program and its mediating conditions. Drawing on ethnographic methods and a sociocultural understanding of language, we examined both teachers’ and students’ language ideologies and language practices, including the use of Spanish, English, and code-switching. The English language arts teacher adhered to strict language separation as dictated by the TWDL model, while the Spanish language arts teacher instructed in both English and Spanish to accommodate standardized test preparation. Students enacted agency to engage in their hybrid language practices. Despite the multiplicity and, at times, contradictory ideologies embodied and articulated by both teachers, the overarching dominant language ideology of English superiority was present and powerful. We discuss implications for dual language implementation, including the role of standardized testing, students as language policy makers, and teacher (mis)alignment between articulated and embodied ideologies.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 75-92 (18 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Multilingual Research Journal (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/03/2015

Publication status

Published - 04/03/2015

ISSN

1931-3152

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84928618600

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.86
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
citations
24
SciVal
Paper percentile
86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
88
Mentions
1
Citation count
44