Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Temporal variability in fish assemblages from disturbed and undistrubed streams

  • Michael H. Paller(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • AECOM
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Fish assemblages were sampled by electrofishing over a two- to ten-year period in undisturbed and anthropogenically disturbed South Carolina coastal plain streams. Jaccard similarity, Bray-Curtis similarity, and Spearman rank correlations among samples collected from the same sites over time were significantly greater at undisturbed sites than at disturbed sites, suggesting greater fish assemblage persistence and stability at the undisturbed sites. The Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) also exhibited significantly less variation over time at undisturbed sites than at disturbed sites. Physical habitat structure changed more over time at disturbed sites than at undisturbed sites, and this variability was directly related to temporal variability in fish assemblage structure. Comparisons between multiple and single pass electrofishing samples suggested that only a small proportion of the temporal variability observed at the study sites was caused by inefficient sampling. Assessment of temporal variation in fish assemblage structure can serve as an indicator of environmental disturbance and facilitate the distinction of substantive ecological change from normal backgrourrd variation.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 149-158 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/2002

Publication status

Published - 11/2002

ISSN

1386-1980

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0036872167

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.47
SciVal
Author count
1
SciVal
citations
16
SciVal
Paper percentile
66
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
18
Captures
34