Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Video: temporary gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: endoscopic placement of electrodes (ENDOstim).

  • Sumanth R. Daram
    ,
  • Shou Jiang Tang
    ,
  • Thomas L. Abell(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown high-frequency, low-energy gastric electrical stimulation (GES) to be an effective management strategy for patients with medication refractory gastroparesis. However, placement of a permanent GES device requires surgery and has considerable cost considerations. More importantly, however, this mode of therapy may not be successful for all patients. Patients likely to benefit from such an invasive and expensive procedure could be selected on the basis of their response to temporary GES. Electrodes for the purpose of temporary GES usually are placed percutaneously or through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (PEGStim). This study demonstrated an easier and less cumbersome placement of these electrodes endoscopically [1-3]. Methods: The current case involved a 32-year-old man with diabetic gastroparesis. The endoscopic methods and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi. Informed consent was obtained before the procedure. Standard upper endoscopy was performed initially. A temporary cardiac pacing lead (Model 6414-200; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used as the electrode. The video demonstrates an innovative technique of endoscopic placement of electrodes for temporary GES. The external stimulation device used was the standard GES device (Enterra; Medtronic). Results: Temporary GES produced a rapid and marked improvement in the patient's intractable symptoms, improvement in his health-related quality-of-life score, electrogastrography parameters, and gastric emptying. Although the temporary electrodes could have been removed easily by gentle traction in a counterclockwise direction, the patient desired that the electrodes be left in place until permanent electrode placement. Conclusion: For patients such as the man in the current case, who do not have a preexisting PEG tube, the authors demonstrated that endoscopic placement of electrodes is technically feasible. The reported patient likely will benefit from surgical placement of a permanent GES device. Thus, the authors propose ENDOStim as the preferred method for placement of electrodes for temporary GES.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 3444-3445 (2 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Surgical Endoscopy (Volume 25, Issue 10)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 05/10/2011
  • Published - 10/01/2011

Publication status

Published - 10/01/2011

ISSN

0930-2794

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84856172447
  • PubMed: 21556999

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.98
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
citations
18
SciVal
Paper percentile
75
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
38
Social media
2
Citation count
25