Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The Clinical Value of Computerized Information Services a Review of 98 Randomized Clinical Trials

  • E. Andrew Balas(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Suzanne M. Austin
    ,
  • Joyce A. Mitchell
    ,
  • Bernard G. Ewigman
    ,
  • Kenneth D. Bopp
    ,
  • Gordon D. Brown
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Missouri
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objective: To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied. Data Sources: Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used. Study Selection: The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care. Data Extraction: Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes. Data Synthesis: Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82%), particularly in primary care (66%). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64% of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76%). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/ therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P<.05). Conclusions: Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 271-278 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Archives of Family Medicine (Volume 5, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/1996

Publication status

Published - 05/1996

ISSN

1063-3987

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0030137968
  • PubMed: 8620266

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
157
SciVal
FWCI
8.66
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
97
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
274
Citation count
184