Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The Decision-Making Process of Young Adult Women with Cancer Who Considered Fertility Cryopreservation

  • Patricia E. Hershberger(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Lorna Finnegan
    ,
  • Penny F. Pierce
    ,
  • Bert Scoccia
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: To provide an in-depth description of the decision-making process that women who are diagnosed with cancer undergo as they decide whether to accept or decline fertility cryopreservation. Design: A qualitative, grounded theory approach. Setting and Participants: Twenty-seven women (mean age = 29 years) who were diagnosed with cancer and were eligible for egg, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation were recruited from the Internet and two university centers. Methods: Each woman participated in a semistructured interview by phone (n = 21) or e-mail (n = 6). Data were analyzed using the constant-comparative method to inductively ascertain the women's decision-making process. NVivo 8 software was used to assist with data retrieval and analysis. Results: The decision-making process consists of four major phases that women experience to actively formulate a decision: identify, contemplate, resolve, and engage. In the identify phase, women acquire knowledge and experience a "double hit" scenario that is often devastating. Within the contemplate phase, five interrelated dimensions emerged including constructing and/or endorsing preferences and values and undergoing decisional debriefing sessions. A decision is reached in the resolve phase and carried out in the engage phase. Among the participants, 14 declined fertility cryopreservation and 13 accepted egg and/or embryo cryopreservation. Conclusion: The descriptive theoretical framework clarifies the underlying processes that women with cancer undergo to decide about fertility cryopreservation. Quality of care for women with cancer can be improved by implementing appropriately timed information and tailored developmental and contextual counseling to support decision making.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 59-69 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing (Volume 42, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2013

Publication status

Published - 2013

ISSN

0884-2175

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84872408448
  • PubMed: 23167639

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
5.48
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
50
SciVal
Paper percentile
93
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
125
Citation count
65

Funding Details

Funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Office of Research on Women's Health (Grant #K12 HD055892) and by the University of Michigan Office of the Vice President for Research.