Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The effect of the APACHE II score and selected clinical variables on survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  • Mark H. Ebell(corresponding author)
    ,
  • P. S. Preston
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this analysis is to determine the effect of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and other clinical variables on survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to identify patient subpopulations with extremely poor survival. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 218 consecutive adult inpatients undergoing CPR on the general wards and in the intensive care units of a community hospital between January 1,1989, and July 1, 1991. The patient's age, sex, prior residence, reason for admission, discharge diagnoses, discharge disposition, APACHE II score, and cardiac ejection fraction by echocardiography were recorded. Results: The age, sex, and reason for admission were not significant predictors of survival following CPR. Multiple variable analysis revealed that an increasing APACHE II score (P=.05), a serum creatinine greater than 311 μmol per L (3.5 mg per dL, P=.02), and metastatic cancer (P=.04) were each related to a decreased rate of survival to discharge following CPR. Patient subpopulations with a 0% rate of survival to discharge included those with metastatic cancer (n=26, P=.02), a serum creatinine greater than 311 μmol per L (3.5 mg per dL) on admission (n=22, P=. 03), and a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease with an APACHE II score greater than 15 on admission (n-18, P=.007). Conclusions: The APACHE II score is a useful predictor of failure to survive to discharge following CPR. Several groups of patients were identified with negligible rates of survival to discharge. Physicians should use such prediagnostic information to provide patients with informed consent when discussing do-not-resucitate (DNR) orders. We suggest that physicians make a special effort to address the DNR status of patients falling to one of the negligible-survival groups identified by this study.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 191-196 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Family medicine (Volume 25, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/1993

Publication status

Published - 01/01/1993

ISSN

0742-3225

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0027460149
  • PubMed: 8458561

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX

Captures
34
Citation count
39