Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The epidemiology of firework-related injuries in the United States: 2000-2010

  • Justin Xavier Moore(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Gerald McGwin
    ,
  • Russell L. Griffin
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to examine the epidemiology of firework-related injuries among an emergency department (ED) nationally representative population of the United States for the years 20002010, including whether the type of firework causing the injury is differential by patient demographics and whether the severity of injury is associated with the firework type.

Methods: The data analysed in this study was collected from the Consumer Product Safety Commissions (CPSCs) National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS).

Results: A total of 2812 injuries represented an estimated 97,562 firework-related injuries treated in emergency departments within the United States from 2000 to 2010. The incidence generally decreased over time. With respect to age, the rate was higher for children, with the highest rates being observed for 1019 year olds (7.28 per 100,000 persons) and 09 year olds (5.45 per 100,000 persons). The injury rate was nearly three times higher for males compared to the female counterparts (4.48 vs. 1.57 per 100,000 persons). Females were less likely than males to severely injure themselves with all types of fireworks besides sparklers/novelty devices (OR 1.08, CI 0.264.38).

Discussion: The results from this suggest that firework-related injuries have decreased by nearly 30% over the 11-year period between 2000 and 2010. Moreover, there has been a decreasing trend in the type of firework causing injury for every firework type excluding the unspecified firework type. However, adolescents of 1019 years old had the highest rate of injury for fireworks over the 11-year period. In addition odds of injury are differential by firework type.

Conclusion: Understanding the specific types of fireworks may lead to better preventative methods and regulations. Moreover, preventative methods should be taken to reduce the rate of firework-related injuries among U.S. youths [1], and possibly more regulations and enforcement of laws geared towards prohibiting novice use of fireworks.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1704-1709 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Injury (Volume 45, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/01/2014

Publication status

Published - 11/01/2014

ISSN

0020-1383

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84908030780
  • PubMed: 25047335

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
2.27
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
citations
41
SciVal
Paper percentile
92
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
62
Mentions
4
Citation count
75