The impact of different accounting reporting methods on the informativeness of research and development costs: IFRS compared to U.S. GAAP
- Michael T. Dugan(corresponding author),
- John E. McEldowney,
- ,
- Clark M. Wheatley
- ,
- University of North Florida,
- University of Texas Rio Grande Valley,
- Florida International University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewAbstract
In this paper, we examine the information content and value relevance of research and development (R&D) costs before and after the SEC eliminated the 20-F reconciliation to U.S. GAAP for Foreign Public Issuers (FPIs). Prior to the elimination both FPIs and U.S. firms experienced an increase in the indirect effect of R&D on operating income. After the requirement was eliminated, the direct effect increased for FPIs and the indirect effect decreased. This is in contrast to U.S. firms who experienced a continued increase in the indirect effect. This shift indicates there was a loss of informativeness in the R&D disclosures for FPIs.
Publication Information
Output type
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
English (US)Article number
1650025Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (Volume 19, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 12/01/2016
Publication status
Published - 12/01/2016
ISSN
0219-0915Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85011838467
Publication metrics
Metrics
SciVal
FWCI
0.37
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
53
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
PlumX, opens in new tab
Usage
23
Captures
22
Citation count
5
