Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The impact of different accounting reporting methods on the informativeness of research and development costs: IFRS compared to U.S. GAAP

  • Michael T. Dugan(corresponding author)
    ,
  • John E. McEldowney
    ,
  • ,
  • Clark M. Wheatley
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the information content and value relevance of research and development (R&D) costs before and after the SEC eliminated the 20-F reconciliation to U.S. GAAP for Foreign Public Issuers (FPIs). Prior to the elimination both FPIs and U.S. firms experienced an increase in the indirect effect of R&D on operating income. After the requirement was eliminated, the direct effect increased for FPIs and the indirect effect decreased. This is in contrast to U.S. firms who experienced a continued increase in the indirect effect. This shift indicates there was a loss of informativeness in the R&D disclosures for FPIs.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Article number

1650025

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (Volume 19, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 12/01/2016

ISSN

0219-0915

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85011838467

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.37
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
53
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Usage
23
Captures
22
Citation count
5