Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The nature and necessity of operational flexibility in the emergency department

  • Michael J. Ward(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Lauren F. Laker
    ,
  • Craig M. Froehle
    ,
  • Timothy J. Vogus
    ,
  • Robert S. Dittus
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Vanderbilt University
    ,
  • Clemson University
    ,
  • University of Cincinnati
    ,
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • George Washington University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Hospital-based emergency departments (EDs), given their high cost and major role in allocating care resources, are at the center of the debate about how to maximize value in delivering health care in the United States. To operate effectively and create value, EDs must be flexible, having the ability to rapidly adapt to the highly variable needs of patients. The concept of flexibility has not been well described in the ED literature. We introduce the concept, outline its potential benefits, and provide some illustrative examples to facilitate incorporating flexibility into ED management. We draw on operations research and organizational theory to identify and describe 5 forms of flexibility: physical, human resource, volume, behavioral, and conceptual. Each form of flexibility may be useful individually or in combination with other forms in improving ED performance and enhancing value. We also offer suggestions for measuring operational flexibility in the ED. A better understanding of operational flexibility and its application to the ED may help us move away from reactive approaches of managing variable demand to a more systematic approach. We also address the tension between cost and flexibility and outline how "partial flexibility" may help resolve some challenges. Applying concepts of flexibility from other disciplines may help clinicians and administrators think differently about their workflow and provide new insights into managing issues of cost, flow, and quality in the ED.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 156-161 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of Emergency Medicine (Volume 65, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/01/2015

Publication status

Published - 02/01/2015

ISSN

0196-0644

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84928183603
  • PubMed: 25233811

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
22
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
3.04
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
84

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
5
Citation count
42
Captures
83