Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The Roles of Working Memory and Oral Language Abilities in Elicited Imitation Performance

  • Hae In Park
    ,
  • Megan Solon
    ,
  • Carly Henderson
    ,
  • Marzieh Dehghan–Chaleshtori
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

While an elicited imitation test (EIT) has been widely used as a measure of oral proficiency in second language acquisition (SLA) research, it is still unclear the extent to which memory capacity impacts EIT performance. In light of this gap, the present study sought to clarify the nature of elicited imitation by examining the relative contributions of language ability and phonological short-term memory (PSTM) to EIT performance. Seventy-eight second language (L2) learners of Spanish, who were grouped into 3 Spanish experience levels, took a Spanish EIT, an L2 oral narrative task, and a nonword repetition (NWR) task in their first language. Results demonstrated that learners’ EIT performance was primarily predicted by complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) measures extracted from the oral narrative task rather than NWR scores, which served as an index for PSTM capacity. Furthermore, the present study provided suggestive evidence that PSTM capacity may differentially mediate EIT performance depending on the extent of learners’ proficiency in and experience with Spanish. While facilitative effects for PSTM capacity were observed for less experienced learners, no effects were found for more experienced learners.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 133-151 (19 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Modern Language Journal (Volume 104, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 01/01/2020
  • Published - 03/01/2020

Publication status

Published - 03/01/2020

ISSN

0026-7902

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85078074005

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
57
Social media
64
Citation count
28