Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Tracheal Size Variability is Associated with Sex: Implications for Endotracheal Tube Selection

  • Arunabha Karmakar
    ,
  • Mariah B. Pate
    ,
  • Nancy L. Solowski
    ,
  • Gregory N. Postma
    ,
  • Paul M. Weinberger(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Whereas selection of endotracheal tube (ETT) size in pediatric patients benefits from predictive nomograms, adult ETT sizing is relatively arbitrary. We sought to determine associations between cervical tracheal cross-sectional area (CTCSA) and clinical variables. Methods: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing noncontrasted chest computed tomography (CT) at a single tertiary care institution from January 2010 to June 2011 were reviewed. Patients with improper CT technique, endotracheal intubation, and pulmonary/tracheal pathology were excluded. Tracheal luminal diameters in anteroposterior (D1) and transverse (D2) were measured 2 cm inferior to the cricoid and used to determine CTCSA = π∗D1∗D2∗1/4. The demographic variables of age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were tested for association with CTCSA by Spearman correlation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare CTCSA by race and sex. Multivariate linear regression was performed including all clinical variables. Results: There were 91 patients who met inclusion criteria. There was no correlation between age, weight, or BMI and CTCSA. There was a significant positive correlation between patient height and CTCSA (P =.001, R = 0.35); however, this was confounded by sex. Female patients had significantly smaller CTCSA (mean = 241 mm2) compared to male patients (mean = 349 mm2, P <.001). Multivariate linear regression stratified by sex revealed that height is correlated with CTCSA only in males (P =.028). Males also had more variability in CTCSA (SD 118.6) compared to females (SD 65.5). Conclusion: Our data suggest that selection of ETT size in male patients should include height as a predictive factor. For female patients, it may be appropriate to select a uniformly smaller diameter ETT size.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 132-136 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology (Volume 124, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/01/2015

Publication status

Published - 02/01/2015

ISSN

0003-4894

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84925285330
  • PubMed: 25305266

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.40
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.60
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
16
SciVal
FWCI
1.57
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
78

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
30
Captures
53